Tullus Hostilius (3rd king of Rome, r. ca. 673–642 BCE)

Main Political Characteristics

Militaristic turn:

Ancient writers (Livy, Dionysius of Halicarnassus) describe him as the opposite of Numa. Where Numa stressed religion and peace, Tullus promoted expansion by arms.

Aggressive foreign policy:

Wars against Alba Longa, Fidenae, Veii, and the Sabines. The legendary episode of the Horatii and Curiatii duel belongs here (a ritualized conflict resolution between Rome and Alba).

State consolidation through conquest:

After Alba Longa’s destruction, Tullus supposedly resettled its population in Rome, swelling Rome’s manpower and extending its patrician houses.}

Institutions of that Time

Kingship (regnum):

Still monarchical, with king as supreme military, judicial, and religious figure.

Senate:

Advisory council of patres (elders), as in Romulus’ time, retained prestige but king’s military role overshadowed their influence.

Assembly (comitia curiata):

Still largely ceremonial; citizens ratified decisions but did not direct policy.

Religion:

Unlike Numa, Tullus initially neglected cults. Livy claims this impiety led to plague and his downfall — then he tried to restore rites, but the gods (esp. Jupiter) punished him.

Polis Management & Social Order

Urban integration:

With Alba Longa’s population merged, Rome expanded socially and physically (settling the Caelian Hill).

Militarization of society:

Civic duties were increasingly tied to military obligation, reinforcing the warrior role of the citizen.

Rights & strata (continuity from Romulus):

Patricians (patres):
Retained dominance in politics and Senate.

Plebeians:
Increasingly numerous after Alba’s absorption, but rights remained limited; political weight still minimal.

Clients:
Expanded class, dependent on patrician patrons for protection and representation.

No democracy:
Authority still concentrated in monarchy + patrician elite. Assemblies functioned but without true legislative power.

Comparison vs. Romulus & Numa

Romulus: Founded institutions, organized Senate, defined patricians/clients. Warrior-king model.
Numa: Religious pacifier; instituted priesthoods, cult order, regulated rites.
Tullus: Swung back to Romulus’ militarism, expanded Rome through conquest, but without new constitutional reforms — his legacy is territorial/urban, not institutional.

Tullus Hostilius – Reforms & Main Changes

Military focus:

Organized wars against Alba Longa, Fidenae, Veii, Sabines.
Legendary duel (Horatii vs. Curiatii) as ritualized warfare institution.

Population integration:

After Alba Longa’s destruction, transferred much of its population (patricians + commoners) to Rome.
New patrician families entered the Senate.
Caelian Hill settled by newcomers.

Institutional:

No major new civil or religious institutions credited to him (unlike Numa).
Tried to revive neglected rituals later, but associated with impiety.

Urban development:

Expanded city space, incorporating new population zones.

Economy of the Period

Agriculture: Main basis; conquest brought new land and manpower.
Labor supply: Influx of Alba Longa population increased available labor and military strength.
Early integration economy: Merging populations meant new client–patron ties, strengthening patrician estates.
No evidence of trade reforms or auctions/markets: Unlike later kings (esp. Ancus Marcius, who built the port at Ostia). Under Tullus, focus remained martial, not commercial.

Comparative Table: Romulus → Numa → Tullus
Aspect Romulus Numa Pompilius Tullus Hostilius
Main Characteristic Warrior-founder Religious lawgiver Warrior-expander
Political Institutions Senate of patres; curiae assemblies; kingship central ,Priesthoods (Pontifex Maximus, Vestals, Flamines); cult regulation No new institutions; reinforced Senate with Alba’s patricians
Religion Basic cults, Jupiter Feretrius, augury Systematic cults, temples, calendars, rituals Neglected rites → later tried restoring, but seen as impious
Social Structure Patricians, plebeians, clients established Reinforced class duties via religious legitimation Expanded patriciate by absorption of Alban houses
Economy Subsistence agriculture, cattle, no formal markets Same agricultural base, stable/ritual economy Expansion by conquest, land and manpower increase
Military War with neighbors; defense of settlements Peaceful reign, avoided wars Aggressive campaigns; destruction of Alba Longa
Urban Development Initial settlement on Palatine, Forum valley drainage Religious monuments, shrines Settlement of Caelian Hill with Alba Longa migrants
Democracy? No — monarchy + Senate dominance No — monarchy but sacral authority moderated power No — monarchy + Senate, militaristic elite strengthened

Numa Pompilius, Second King of Rome

The second king of Rome, Numa Pompilius, is presented through his key reforms, reign policy, and the development of Roman society. Read more, visit the publication (click here).

Ancus Marcius, the Fourth King of Rome

Ancus Marcius was one of Rome’s kings. What reforms he provided, and what Roman society was like during his reign — you may find many interesting facts by visiting our publication (click here).

The Roman King Tarquinius Priscus

The fifth king of Rome, Tarquinius Priscus — have you heard about the rules and innovations this king implemented in Rome, and his impact on later Roman development? There were quite a few... Learn more by visiting the publication.

Tarquinius Superbus, the Last King of Rome

Tarquinius Superbus, the last king of Rome. This publication discovers Roman society and the main political and social structures of his period, as well as the reforms attempted to be implemented during his reign.