Fantasy: Genre Description and How to Participate in the Category Competition

Fantasy is a literary genre built upon the presence of the impossible treated as meaningful reality within the work. It is concerned with worlds, forces, beings, or events that exceed the ordinary laws of nature and human limitation, yet are rendered with internal coherence so that the reader may enter them as if they possessed their own truth. Magic, mythical creatures, invented cosmologies, supernatural powers, enchanted objects, prophetic structures, and wholly or partly secondary worlds commonly belong to this genre, though fantasy is not defined merely by decoration or spectacle. Its essence lies in the serious imaginative construction of a reality in which the marvellous is not accidental, but constitutive.

A fantasy work may unfold in a fully invented world, in a transformed historical setting, in a hidden magical layer beneath ordinary life, or in a symbolic realm whose laws diverge from those of empirical reality. What is essential is that the narrative admits impossibility not as metaphor alone, nor as dream without consequence, but as an operative principle of the story’s world, conflict, and meaning. The impossible must function within the work as part of its actual dramatic substance.

From the literary point of view, fantasy requires more than the insertion of magical motifs. The genre calls for a formed imaginative order. The extraordinary elements must have narrative consequence, structural necessity, and artistic integration. Magic must affect action, character, stakes, or world-order; mythical beings must be more than ornament; invented realms must shape the moral, emotional, political, or metaphysical logic of the work. A text does not become fantasy merely because it mentions a dragon, a spell, or an ancient prophecy. The fantastical element must be woven into the governing identity of the piece.

The shape of fantasy literature often includes world-formation, mythic atmosphere, conflict between forces greater than the private self, symbolic or metaphysical layering, and a sense that reality contains hidden depths beyond the visible. Yet fantasy may appear in many scales and modes: epic, intimate, dark, lyrical, fairy-tale, heroic, philosophical, folkloric, comic, or experimental. The genre is therefore not limited by tone, length, or setting, but by the centrality and legitimacy of the fantastical principle within the work.

For competition purposes, the category of Fantasy should be understood as requiring a work to possess a clear and substantive fantastical foundation. The impossible must be presented as real within the terms of the narrative. The work must establish, imply, or sustain a world-logic in which magical, mythical, supernatural, or secondary-world elements are indispensable to the story’s structure, atmosphere, and meaning. The genre must not be mistaken for mere strangeness, surreal mood, allegorical abstraction, or decorative imagery without true fantastical function.

A work submitted under Fantasy should ordinarily possess the following literary qualities:

1. Presence of the impossible as narrative reality

The work must contain elements that do not belong to ordinary natural law — such as magic, supernatural agencies, mythical creatures, invented races, enchanted objects, alternative cosmologies, or impossible worlds — and these elements must be treated as real within the narrative frame.

2. Internal coherence of the fantastical order

Even when the world is wondrous, it must not be arbitrary. The work should suggest a consistent logic, atmosphere, metaphysical order, or governing imaginative structure through which the reader can understand the conditions of the impossible.

3. Structural necessity of fantastical elements

The magical or mythical components must matter. They should influence conflict, character movement, stakes, resolution, symbolism, or world-formation. If removed, the work should lose a substantial part of its identity.

4. World-bearing quality

Fantasy usually implies that the world of the work is larger than the immediately visible action. Whether through lore, atmosphere, history, cosmology, ancestry, prophecy, sacred systems, or invented geographies, the text should give the sense of a formed imaginative horizon beyond the surface plot.

5. Integration of wonder with literary craft

The marvellous must not replace literary discipline. Language, structure, imagery, pacing, and characterization should remain artistically controlled. Fantasy is not exempt from form merely because it deals in impossibility.

6. Emotional and thematic seriousness within the invented frame

Even when playful or adventurous, fantasy should carry imaginative conviction. Its impossible elements should contribute to deeper tensions: power, destiny, sacrifice, transformation, mortality, temptation, exile, identity, memory, sacred order, corruption, hope, or the struggle between worlds and values.

7. Distinction from adjacent genres

A work is not fantasy merely because it is strange, dreamlike, symbolic, or horrific. The fantastical content must be central enough to justify genre classification. If the impossible is explained away scientifically, the work may belong more properly to science fiction. If the supernatural appears chiefly to instil fear, it may incline toward horror. If the impossible remains only ambiguous, psychological, or metaphorical, the text may not fully satisfy fantasy requirements.

For a work to qualify as Fantasy in the competition category, it should possess the following defining features:

A fantasy work must be a literary composition in which magical, mythical, supernatural, or secondary-world elements form an essential and undeniable part of the narrative reality. These elements must not be incidental embellishments, but integral components of the work’s structure, atmosphere, and meaning. The narrative must admit the impossible as operative truth within its own frame, and the fantastical dimension must shape the identity of the piece in a decisive way.

The category therefore includes works such as:

• narratives set in secondary or invented worlds;
• stories governed by magic, prophecy, enchantment, or supernatural law;
• works involving mythical beings, legendary structures, or enchanted realms;
• literary texts in which impossible realities materially affect events, character, and thematic development.

The category does not properly include:

• realistic works with only decorative references to myth or magic;
• texts in which fantasy appears only as dream, hallucination, or figurative language without narrative reality;
• works whose central mechanism is scientific speculation rather than the marvellous;
• works where supernatural material is too minor, too ambiguous, or too ornamental to govern the genre identity.

To be judged as genuinely belonging to Fantasy, the submitted work should meet these core requirements:

The fantastical element must be essential, not optional.

If the magical or impossible dimension can be removed without altering the fundamental nature of the story, the work is likely not fantasy in a sufficient genre sense.

The work must establish belief within its own imaginative order.

The reader need not believe the world is realistic, but must feel that the text believes in its own impossible conditions and sustains them with artistic seriousness.

The world or supernatural logic must show meaningful coherence.

Absolute explanation is not required, but the work should not rely on pure randomness. There should be some intelligible relation among powers, beings, places, or laws.

The fantastical dimension must shape the literary experience.

It should influence tone, imagery, stakes, conflict, and thematic weight, not merely provide exotic surface detail.

The work must remain literature, not only concept.

However imaginative the premise, the submission must still demonstrate literary construction: command of language, form, atmosphere, characterization, and compositional integrity.

Wonder must be artistically embodied.

The impossible should be rendered vividly and convincingly through the actual writing, not merely announced in abstract terms.

When a literary committee evaluates a work submitted under the Fantasy category, it usually proceeds not merely by asking whether magical elements are present, but whether the work truly belongs to fantasy as a formed literary composition. The jury commonly considers three principal dimensions: genre correctness, artistic value, and shape requirements. Within these dimensions, a number of recurring features are ordinarily taken into account.

Genre correctness

The committee first determines whether the work genuinely belongs to the fantasy genre in substance rather than in superficial appearance.

Presence of a true fantastical basis: The jury considers whether the work is founded upon a real fantastical premise: magic, supernatural law, mythical beings, enchanted matter, secondary-world conditions, or impossible structures treated as operative reality within the narrative. A passing mention of myth, a dreamlike image, or symbolic strangeness alone is not sufficient.

Necessity of the fantastical element: A commonly applied criterion is whether the fantasy component is essential to the work. If the magical or impossible dimension could be removed without damaging the core story, the jury may conclude that the submission does not fully satisfy the category.

Stability of the imaginative law: The committee usually observes whether the fantastical world possesses an intelligible order. Fantasy need not explain everything, yet it should create the impression that its wonders arise from a coherent imaginative system rather than from random invention added for effect.

Proper distinction from neighbouring genres: The jury often examines whether the submission is in fact fantasy rather than horror, science fiction, allegory without operative fantasy, or realism ornamented with folklore. The governing logic of the work must remain recognizably fantastical.

Integration of world and event: A fantasy work is often judged by the degree to which its world, forces, and beings are not merely present, but active in determining action, conflict, and consequence. The fantastical dimension must participate in the making of the narrative.

Artistic value

Once genre correctness is established, the committee ordinarily considers the literary merit of the work as an artistic object.

Quality of language: The jury commonly pays close attention to diction, tonal consistency, imagery, rhythm of prose or verse, and the writer’s general command of literary expression. However inventive the setting, weak language diminishes artistic standing.

Strength of imaginative vision: Fantasy is frequently judged by the vitality of its invention. The committee often values originality of conception, evocative atmosphere, freshness of mythic or magical construction, and the power with which the work makes the impossible feel vivid and persuasive.

Depth of theme: The jury usually asks whether the work rises above decorative marvel and engages larger human, moral, philosophical, emotional, or metaphysical concerns. Strong fantasy often treats power, loss, destiny, corruption, memory, sacrifice, exile, identity, faith, death, hope, or transformation through its invented frame.

Emotional conviction: A common standard is whether the work produces real imaginative and emotional force. The reader should not merely observe wonders, but feel the stakes of what is endangered, desired, discovered, or transformed.

Symbolic and imaginative resonance: The committee often values fantasy that carries layered significance. Magical objects, creatures, journeys, kingdoms, curses, or prophecies may be judged not only by their plot function, but by the symbolic pressure they bear within the work.

Artistic restraint and proportion: The jury frequently takes into account whether the writer governs invention with discipline. Excessive accumulation of names, systems, creatures, and lore without artistic necessity may weaken the work. Richness is valued when ordered; excess is often regarded as a structural fault.

Shape requirements

The committee also examines whether the work possesses a proper literary shape appropriate to the genre and to its chosen form.

Structural coherence: The jury usually looks for an intelligible narrative or compositional structure. The events must not merely follow one another as a sequence of wonders, but form a shaped progression with relation between beginning, development, crisis, and resolution, or an equally coherent alternative design.

Unity of the fantastical framework: The magical, mythical, or secondary-world components should belong to one artistic whole. The committee often notices when separate ideas seem imported from unrelated traditions without integration, thereby damaging the unity of the work.

Balance between exposition and action: Fantasy often requires explanation, but juries commonly examine whether worldbuilding overwhelms the literary movement. The work should not collapse into encyclopedia, background summary, or lore catalogue. The imaginative world must be embodied through living dramatic or poetic form.

Consistency of tone: A submission is often judged by whether its tonal register remains controlled. If the work shifts carelessly between heroic gravity, parody, sentimentality, darkness, and wonder without artistic intention, the jury may regard its shape as unstable.

Character relation to world: The committee commonly observes whether characters are genuinely formed within the fantastical order. They should not feel like ordinary placeholders moving through decorative scenery; their motives, speech, fears, desires, and transformations should belong to the world the work creates.

Proportion of detail: The jury usually attends to the economy and placement of details. A strong fantasy text often selects and orders its elements so that names, customs, histories, magical rules, and descriptions deepen the piece rather than burden it.

Resolution appropriate to the work’s own law: A common consideration is whether the ending proceeds from what the work has established. Arbitrary rescue, unexplained power, or sudden rule changes may be judged as weaknesses of shape. The conclusion should arise persuasively from the imaginative contract the text has made with the reader.

From the literary point of view, a committee commonly regulates its judgment through a sequence of internal questions:

1. Does the work truly belong to fantasy? :The jury first asks whether the fantastical principle is genuine, central, and operative. This is the threshold question of category correctness.
2. Does the work sustain its invented reality convincingly? : The committee then considers whether the impossible has been rendered with internal authority, coherence, and imaginative seriousness.
3. Does the work possess literary merit independent of its premise? : A strong idea alone is never enough. The jury usually asks whether the writing itself demonstrates artistry: language, structure, atmosphere, characterization, thematic force, and compositional control.
4. Does the fantastical material deepen the work rather than merely decorate it? : The committee often distinguishes between ornamental fantasy and organic fantasy. In the stronger work, wonder is inseparable from meaning.
5. Does the work achieve a completed shape? : Even highly imaginative submissions are expected to possess form. The jury usually considers whether the piece feels made, governed, and brought into artistic wholeness.

Formal evaluative definition

For committee purposes, the Fantasy category is commonly evaluated by asking whether the submitted work presents a genuinely fantastical narrative reality, whether that reality is imaginatively coherent and structurally necessary, whether the work possesses literary and artistic value beyond concept alone, and whether its total form exhibits unity, proportion, and compositional discipline. A strong fantasy submission is therefore not merely magical in content, but literary in execution, governed in design, and artistically persuasive in its treatment of the impossible.

Frequent weaknesses the jury may note

The committee also commonly identifies recurring faults in fantasy submissions:

• magical elements added only for surface attraction;
• excessive worldbuilding without narrative life;
• imitation of familiar fantasy models without original vision;
• inconsistent rules of magic or world-logic;
• inflated terminology without artistic necessity;
• weak characterization hidden beneath spectacle;
• symbolic vagueness mistaken for profundity;
• endings resolved by arbitrary power rather than earned development;
• confusion between fantasy atmosphere and actual fantasy structure.

What juries commonly value most highly

In practice, fantasy submissions are often valued most highly when they show the following combined strengths:

1. A clear and indispensable fantastical foundation: The genre identity is beyond doubt.
2. A coherent imaginative order: The world feels governed, not improvised.
3. Strong literary craft: The language and structure are worthy independently of the setting.
4. Originality with control: The work offers invention without chaos.
5. Emotional and thematic depth: The fantasy serves human and artistic significance.
6. Organic unity: Character, world, conflict, symbolism, and style belong to one whole.

Just below, you may see a countdown showing how many days remain before the competition presubmission period begins. On the indicated date, you will be able to visit our competitions and either reserve participation in advance or purchase a gift for someone close to you.

The competition presubmission period will begin in