Science Fiction (Sci-Fi): : Genre Description and How to Participate in the Category Competition for Writers

Science Fiction is a literary genre devoted to the imaginative exploration of scientific possibility, technological development, and their consequences for human life, society, morality, and civilisation. It constructs narratives in which actual science, theoretical knowledge, speculative discovery, or invented technological systems play a meaningful structural role in the story. The genre is concerned not merely with futuristic decoration, but with the intellectual and human implications of change: how people think, govern, survive, adapt, fear, invent, and transform under the pressure of new scientific realities.

A science-fiction work may be set in the future, in space, on other worlds, in altered versions of Earth, or within highly advanced social and technological systems; yet the essence of the genre does not depend solely upon setting. Its defining feature lies in the serious narrative use of scientific or pseudo-scientific premises as a central force shaping the world, the conflict, and the development of the characters. The genre often examines progress, risk, innovation, artificial intelligence, space travel, genetic intervention, robotics, surveillance, ecological collapse, time theory, virtuality, post-human identity, and other phenomena connected to rational or speculative inquiry.

In literary competition terms, Science Fiction must present a world, conflict, or premise substantially grounded in scientific imagination or technological causation. The speculative element should not be ornamental or incidental; it must influence the architecture of the plot, the behaviour of the characters, or the governing conditions of the fictional world. The genre permits broad stylistic diversity — from philosophical and introspective narratives to adventure-driven or dystopian structures — but it requires conceptual coherence and a recognisable relationship between the fictional invention and the logic of science, technological development, or systemic transformation.

A work submitted under Science Fiction should generally possess the following literary and structural qualities:

1. A central speculative premise: The narrative should be built around a scientific, technological, or rationally speculative idea that meaningfully shapes the story.
2. Causal relevance of science or technology: Scientific advancement, invention, discovery, or theoretical possibility must affect the plot, setting, conflict, or character development in a significant way.
3. Internal logical consistency: Even when the work imagines impossible or unproven developments, it should preserve coherence within its own system of rules and consequences.
4. Worldbuilding with conceptual purpose: The setting should not be decorative only; it should reveal how science, technology, or altered conditions influence social order, ethics, identity, environment, or survival.
5. Human response to change: The work should explore how individuals or societies react to scientific transformation, whether through awe, conflict, adaptation, alienation, resistance, or collapse.
6. Speculative seriousness: The fictional idea should be treated as a meaningful narrative mechanism, not merely as fantasy disguised by machines or futuristic terminology.
7. Intellectual and thematic engagement: The genre often benefits from reflection on knowledge, progress, control, responsibility, consciousness, freedom, or the unintended consequences of innovation.
8. Recognisable genre identity: The text should clearly belong to science-fictional discourse rather than primarily to fantasy, myth, supernatural fiction, or pure allegory without scientific grounding.

For a literary work to be correctly classified under Science Fiction, it should possess most of the following defining characteristics:

• A narrative foundation connected to science, technology, futurity, experimentation, or rational speculation.
• A fictional premise that asks “what if” in relation to scientific possibility or social-technological development.
• A plot materially shaped by invention, discovery, altered systems, advanced environments, or non-ordinary conditions derived from scientific reasoning.
• A world governed by intelligible internal principles rather than purely magical or unexplained forces.
• A serious exploration of consequences, whether personal, political, ethical, philosophical, ecological, or civilisational.
• A literary identity in which the speculative element is essential to the work’s meaning and not replaceable without altering the core structure of the text.

A submission is most properly regarded as Science Fiction when:

• the speculative element is central, not secondary;
• the narrative depends upon scientific, technological, or systemic imagination;
• the fictional world demonstrates internal coherence;
• the work examines the effects of innovation, discovery, or altered reality upon human existence;
• the genre identity remains predominantly science-fictional throughout the text.

A work may fail to match the genre fully if the so-called futuristic elements are superficial, if the narrative is primarily magical or mystical without scientific framing, or if the speculative device has no real influence on the dramatic or thematic structure.

When evaluating a submission assigned to the Science Fiction category, the committee ordinarily considers not only the presence of futuristic or technological motifs, but the literary seriousness with which the speculative idea is integrated into the work. A science-fiction text is usually judged by the degree to which its scientific or imagined technological premise is essential to the narrative structure, intellectually coherent within the world of the text, and artistically developed through language, atmosphere, conflict, and human consequence. The jury commonly examines whether the work truly belongs to the science-fiction tradition, whether it possesses literary merit beyond concept alone, and whether its structural form supports the speculative content with discipline and clarity.

1. Genre Correctness

The jury usually considers whether the work is authentically science fiction rather than fantasy, allegory, dystopian drama without scientific basis, or general speculative fiction lacking a defined technological or scientific core. The speculative premise is expected to arise from actual science, plausible extrapolation, theoretical inquiry, or an invented but rationalised technological system. The committee will usually examine whether the scientific or technological element is central to the movement of the plot, the structure of the world, or the thematic argument of the work. If the same story could exist unchanged without its scientific premise, the genre classification may be regarded as weak.

2. Centrality of the Speculative Premise

A jury commonly evaluates whether the imagined invention, discovery, system, experiment, or altered condition serves as a genuine narrative engine. In strong science-fiction writing, the speculative foundation is not ornamental; it produces consequences. It changes the society, the physical conditions, the human relationships, the ethical choices, or the psychological burden under which the characters act. The committee usually values works in which the speculative idea governs the story organically rather than appearing as decoration.

3. Internal Logic and Conceptual Discipline

Science fiction is often judged by the consistency of its own laws. Even when the premise is highly imaginative, the committee usually expects the work to preserve internal coherence. The jury may consider whether the technology, science, or altered reality operates according to stable conditions within the text, whether the consequences follow credibly from the premise, and whether contradictions undermine the seriousness of the fictional construction. Absolute scientific accuracy is not always required; however, conceptual discipline is commonly treated as a major criterion of genre strength.

4. Literary Value Beyond the Idea

A committee does not usually judge science fiction by concept alone. The literary execution remains fundamental. The jury commonly considers the quality of style, narrative control, imagery, rhythm, voice, dramatic construction, emotional precision, and thematic depth. Even a brilliant speculative idea may be judged weakly if expressed through flat language, schematic characters, or crude exposition. Likewise, a modest premise may gain high value if rendered with intellectual force and artistic refinement.

5. Worldbuilding as a Literary Function

The jury usually examines whether the worldbuilding serves the work artistically and structurally. A science-fiction setting should reveal altered conditions of life, systems of belief, technological dependency, political order, environmental pressure, or transformed concepts of humanity. The committee commonly values worldbuilding that is selective, meaningful, and integrated into the narrative rather than overloaded with mechanical information. The world should feel constructed in relation to the story’s human, philosophical, or social concerns.

6. Human and Social Consequence

Science fiction is often valued not merely for invention, but for consequence. The committee usually considers whether the work explores what scientific change does to human beings, institutions, identity, memory, morality, intimacy, class, freedom, or survival. The strongest works often show how technological possibility alters the inner and outer life of the characters. The jury may look for a serious engagement with the tension between innovation and responsibility, progress and ruin, power and vulnerability.

7. Thematic and Philosophical Depth

A jury commonly gives special regard to works that use science fiction to think. The committee may examine whether the work raises substantial questions about consciousness, ethics, governance, time, embodiment, ecological collapse, artificial intelligence, colonial expansion, mortality, or the limits of human control. The speculative device should ideally open a field of reflection rather than merely produce spectacle. A work with thematic seriousness is often judged as having greater artistic endurance.

8. Structural Shape and Narrative Form

The committee usually evaluates whether the work possesses a disciplined literary shape appropriate to the genre. This includes coherence of beginning, development, and conclusion; intelligible escalation of conflict; proportion between exposition and action; and formal balance between idea and story. Science fiction often requires explanation, but the jury generally values works in which exposition is controlled and dramatically embedded. Overloaded explanation, artificial dialogue, and mechanical delivery of information may weaken the shape of the text.

9. Character Construction Under Speculative Conditions

Juries commonly examine whether the characters live credibly within the invented conditions of the work. The committee may consider whether the protagonists and secondary figures are shaped by the scientific environment, whether their motives remain intelligible, and whether they possess psychological or symbolic force. In science fiction, characters should not exist merely to explain the concept; rather, they should embody the conflicts generated by the concept.

10. Originality Within the Tradition

The jury often considers originality not as absolute novelty, but as fresh treatment. Science fiction inevitably shares motifs with a long literary tradition — space travel, dystopia, machines, altered bodies, future states, time distortion — yet the committee usually values works that recombine these elements with intellectual freshness, stylistic distinction, or unusual perspective. Mere imitation of familiar genre formulas may reduce artistic standing, even if the work remains technically competent.

11. Control of Tone and Register

The committee may also take into account whether the tone of the work suits its material. Science fiction can be austere, lyrical, tragic, satirical, analytical, adventurous, or meditative; however, the tonal register should remain controlled. The jury usually values tonal consistency and artistic intentionality, especially when the work addresses complex speculative material. A mismatch between theme and tone may weaken the work’s authority.

12. Fulfilment of Category Shape Requirements

Finally, the jury commonly determines whether the work satisfies the formal expectations of the category itself: that it is recognisably literary, structurally coherent, genre-appropriate, and shaped by a central science-fiction premise with real thematic and narrative consequence. The committee does not usually reward superficial futurism alone. The text is expected to demonstrate that its science-fiction identity belongs to its essence, not merely to its surface.

Under evaluation procedure, juries usually take into account whether the submission:

• genuinely belongs to the science-fiction genre;
• is built upon a central and meaningful speculative premise;
• preserves internal logical coherence;
• demonstrates literary artistry in language, structure, and form;
• develops worldbuilding with thematic purpose;
• explores human, ethical, social, or philosophical consequences;
• maintains strong narrative shape and proportion;
• presents characters shaped by the speculative conditions;
• offers artistic seriousness and originality within the genre tradition.

Just below, you may see a countdown showing how many days remain before the competition presubmission period begins. On the indicated date, you will be able to visit our competitions and either reserve participation in advance or purchase a gift for someone close to you.

The competition presubmission period will begin in